It's been a misunderstanding, now it's cleared. If he claims so, and also he never meant to give the mystic access to the memory, I would give him the benefit of a doubt. The prisoner has a fair case if he actually was roleplaying when he said yes. If it's two players, I'll say it's time to talk to them. I say perhaps, because I know some groups could react to this, some will not, depending on play style and "faith" in the DM. Basically make this a special ability of the NPC. ![]() If it's an NPC, you could perhaps just rule that this NPC has powers that makes it work, just to get your campaign going. So back to my original point, why don't they want to give up this information in the first place?Īre we talking about two players where one try to force information from the other or an NPC trying to force information from a PC? It will probably make them really unhappy. In addition, the character can consent to Mind Meld, and the mystic still wouldn't get the information, as its the target's choice of what memory they share, and they are under no compulsion to share this specific information.Ībout the only thing I can think of that might work is Dominate Person but you need to be careful brute forcing a player character like this. So Mystic Charm alone is not enough to allow Mind Meld to work. It merely grants advantage to social checks. ![]() ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |